I had an interesting discussion with a co-worker who couldn't understand that while I consider myself a Christian, I also believe in Buddhism, Satanism, and Atheism. I follow the principles (though not many of the organizational and practice aspects) of the first two and try to live my life accordingly, but recognize the aspects of myself that appreciate and understand the latter two. I know they don't work for me, but I don't automatically condemn someone that they do work for.
I've always felt that if you read just Jesus' words (not Paul the sick bastard, not the old testament stuff) that he sounded very much like Buddha. Her point was that with Buddhism, it is valuable and a necessary experience for enlightment, but it only shows YOU one path valid only for you, whereas Christianity (when properly practiced-which is hasn't been in years, especially the last 5) encourages you to help others find A path that can be valid for many more people besides yourself.
I agree and disagree at the same time.
But then, I do this with many things which driveres wither/or people crazy. Them: the glass: half empty or half full? Me: Yes.
Might as well be asking me about Heaven and Hell or the existence or non-existence of magic. Is there or isn't there there? Yes.
I believe in everything, also the belief of not believing, which in itself IS a belief.
Philosophy 101 teaches that as circular logic. But then, that doesn't do much to expalin what's beyond its own process of analysis. There are things that truly can't be got at through logic. Faith being the big one. Faith of any sort. The power is never what you believe in, but in the act of belief itself.
Wow, that went on longer than I meant it too.